回到 TOP 2 问题,可以明白了扩容机制是通过数组 copy方式,时机就是容量不够的时候,倍数是1.5倍
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
privatevoidgrow(int minCapacity){ // overflow-conscious code int oldCapacity = elementData.length; int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1); if (newCapacity - minCapacity < 0) newCapacity = minCapacity; if (newCapacity - MAX_ARRAY_SIZE > 0) newCapacity = hugeCapacity(minCapacity); // minCapacity is usually close to size, so this is a win: elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity); }
回到 TOP 4 问题,可以明白计算某个元素下标的时间复杂度是 O(n) 的,所以性能没有直接根据下标删除好
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
publicbooleanremove(Object o){ if (o == null) { for (int index = 0; index < size; index++) if (elementData[index] == null) { fastRemove(index); returntrue; } } else { for (int index = 0; index < size; index++) if (o.equals(elementData[index])) { fastRemove(index); returntrue; } } returnfalse; }
privatevoidfastRemove(int index){ modCount++; int numMoved = size - index - 1; if (numMoved > 0) System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index, numMoved); elementData[--size] = null; // clear to let GC do its work }
privatevoidwriteObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream s) throws java.io.IOException{ // Write out element count, and any hidden stuff int expectedModCount = modCount; s.defaultWriteObject();
// Write out size as capacity for behavioural compatibility with clone() s.writeInt(size);
// Write out all elements in the proper order. for (int i=0; i<size; i++) { s.writeObject(elementData[i]); }
if (modCount != expectedModCount) { thrownew ConcurrentModificationException(); } }
// Read in size, and any hidden stuff s.defaultReadObject();
// Read in capacity s.readInt(); // ignored
if (size > 0) { // be like clone(), allocate array based upon size not capacity int capacity = calculateCapacity(elementData, size); SharedSecrets.getJavaOISAccess().checkArray(s, Object[].class, capacity); ensureCapacityInternal(size);
Object[] a = elementData; // Read in all elements in the proper order. for (int i=0; i<size; i++) { a[i] = s.readObject(); } } }